Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with a shortened life expectancy. We assessed causes of death in patients with MPN and matched controls using both relative risks and absolute probabilities in the presence of competing risks.

From Swedish registries, we identified 9,285 patients with MPN and 35,769 matched controls. A flexible parametric model was used to estimate cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of death and cumulative incidence functions, each with 95% CIs.

In patients with MPN, the HRs of death from hematologic malignancies and infections were 92.8 (95% CI, 70.0 to 123.1) and 2.7 (95% CI, 2.4 to 3.1), respectively. In patients age 70 to 79 years at diagnosis (the largest patient group), the HRs of death from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease were 1.5 (95% CI, 1.4 to 1.7) and 1.5 (95% CI, 1.3 to 1.8), respectively; all were statistically significantly elevated compared with those of controls. In the same age group, no difference was observed in the 10-year probability of death resulting from cardiovascular disease in patients with MPN versus controls (16.8% v 15.2%) or cerebrovascular disease (5.6% v 5.2%). In patients age 50 to 59 years at diagnosis, the 10-year probability of death resulting from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease was elevated, 4.2% versus 2.1% and 1.9% versus 0.4%, respectively. Survival in patients with MPN increased over time, mainly because of decreased probabilities of dying as a result of hematologic malignancies, infections, and, in young patients, cardiovascular disease.

Patients with MPN had an overall higher mortality rate than that of matched controls, primarily because of hematologic malignancy, infections, and vascular events in younger patients. Evidently, there is still a need for effective disease-modifying agents to improve patient outcomes.

The myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs)—polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF)—are often associated with reduced life expectancy.13 Despite improved understanding of the molecular bases of MPN as well as improvements in risk stratification and management,49 patients with MPNs have an elevated risk of thromboembolic events, of progression to myelofibrosis, and of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML).1012 In a recent, large, population-based study, patients with all MPN subtypes, including ET, had inferior relative survival.3 Relative survival improved with time, particularly in patients with PV and ET, but excess mortality was still observed in patients with MPN compared with the general population during 2001 to 2008.3

In randomized controlled trials and observational studies involving mainly patients with PV and PMF, cardiovascular disease and transformation to AML represent the most common causes of death.11,1315 ET is often considered to be a more benign disease, and information about causes of death is limited.1618 In addition, causes of death in patients with MPN have seldom been compared with those of the general population. To further improve our understanding of the excess mortality in MPNs, we used information on causes of death and applied a competing risk model to a large cohort of patients with diagnosed MPNs in Sweden from 1973 to 2005 and compared the findings with those of matched controls.

Central Registries

Sweden, a country of 9.5 million people, provides universal medical care for the entire population. The population-based nationwide Swedish Cancer Register, which was established in 1958,19 gathers information about all incident cases of malignant disorders in Sweden. It is mandatory for every physician to report each new diagnosis of MPN to the register.19 All dates and causes of death are recorded in the Cause of Death Register.20

In Sweden, from the mid-1970s to the early 2000s, the Polycythemia Vera Study Group criteria were used for diagnosing PV, ET, and PMF.3,19,21,22 Beginning in 2001, the World Health Organization criteria has gradually replaced this system.23 MPN-unclassifiable was introduced in the Swedish Cancer Register in 1993.12

Patient Cohort

We identified all patients with diagnosed MPN who were reported to the Swedish Cancer Register from 1973 to 2005. Although the Swedish Cancer Register has a high level of coverage, a certain degree of underreporting exists for patients with MPN.12,24 Therefore, we also retrieved information about patients with MPN through the Swedish Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Study Group, which comprises hematology and oncology centers in Sweden, to include patients who were not reported to the cancer register. For each patient with MPN, we randomly selected four controls matched by sex, year of birth, and county of residency from the Swedish Total Population Register using stratified simple random sampling (see Appendix, online only). All controls had to be alive and free from hematologic malignancy at the time of diagnosis for the corresponding patient with MPN. If fewer than four matched controls were found, we chose to include fewer controls per patient rather than imperfectly matched ones. Patients and controls were followed from the date of MPN diagnosis (entry for controls) until death, emigration, or end of follow-up (December 31, 2007), whichever occurred first. From the Cause of Death Register, information about causes of death was collected from January 1, 1973, to December 31, 2007.

Causes of death were classified into six categories: infection, solid tumor, hematologic malignancy, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and other disorders. The category hematologic malignancy included deaths resulting from AML or myelodysplastic syndrome, deaths resulting from myelofibrosis, and a few deaths resulting from hematologic malignancies (eg, lymphoma). The underlying cause of death was considered primary, with two exceptions: If the underlying cause was MPN, the first contributing cause was considered to be the primary cause of death; or, if AML was listed as a cause of death, AML was considered to be the primary cause. Cardiovascular disease included arterial thromboembolism, whereas venous thromboembolism, congestive heart failure, and cardiac arrhythmias were included in other disorders. Deaths resulting from accidents or suicide were included in other disorders.

The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm. Informed consent was waived because we had no contact with study participants.

Statistical Analyses

A flexible parametric survival model was used to estimate cause-specific mortality rates for the six causes of death in patients with MPN compared with matched controls.25,26 This model allows the underlying shape of the hazard function to vary among the different causes.25 Results are presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. In the main analysis, we considered all subtypes combined, and results are presented for all MPN subtypes together, if not specified otherwise. Age was categorized into five groups: 18 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, 70 to 79, or 80 years and older at diagnosis. Calendar period of diagnosis was categorized as 1973 to 1982, 1983 to 1992, 1993 to 2000, or 2001 to 2005. Two-way interactions were assessed by using likelihood ratio tests. A detailed description of the fitted model appears in the Appendix. The final model included the variables patient status (patient with MPN or matched control), sex, age group, calendar period of diagnosis, and an interaction term between patient status and age group. The different causes of death were treated as competing events, and the probability of death from each of the six causes was estimated as a function of time. This is known as the cumulative incidence function and can be obtained through transformation of the cause-specific mortality rates obtained from the flexible parametric model.26

Additional analyses were performed to evaluate the cumulative incidence function for the subtypes PV, ET, and PMF. Because MPN-unclassifiable was not introduced until 1993 and therefore does not cover all four periods, it was not considered in the subtype analysis. All analyses were carried out by using STATA (version 12; http://www.stata.com/stata12).

A total of 9,285 patients with MPN and 35,769 matched controls were included. Of these, 7,938 patients with MPN were identified from the Swedish Cancer Register and 1,347 from the MPN network cohort. Because of the narrow matching criteria for controls, 10.8% of patients with MPN were matched with three controls and 1.9% of patients with MPN were matched with one or two. Forty-seven percent were male, and the median age at diagnosis was 69 years (Table 1). During the first 10 years after diagnosis of MPN, 4,842 (52.1%) patients with MPN and 11,393 (31.9%) controls died.

Table

Table 1. Distribution of Patients With MPNs and Matched Controls With Relation to Age, Sex, and Subtype at Diagnosis

Table 1. Distribution of Patients With MPNs and Matched Controls With Relation to Age, Sex, and Subtype at Diagnosis

Characteristic Calendar Period
1973 to 1982
1983 to 1992
1993 to 2000
2001 to 2005
All
Patients Controls Patients Controls Patients Controls Patients Controls Patients Controls
All, No. 1,643 6,353 2,556 9,739 3,222 12,406 1,864 7,271 9,285 35,769
Age, No.
    18 to 49 years 125 499 246 980 441 1,761 210 839 1,022 4,079
    50 to 59 years 238 942 299 1,184 452 1,798 309 1,231 1,298 5,155
    60 to 69 years 459 1,798 647 2,522 697 2,749 401 1,597 2,204 8,666
    70 to 79 years 586 2,249 956 3,582 1,024 3,905 521 2,029 3,087 11,765
    ≥ 80 years 235 865 408 1,471 608 2,193 423 1,575 1,674 6,104
Median age, years 69 69 70 70 69 70 69 70 69 70
Sex, No.
    Male 819 3,181 1,208 4,616 1,473 5,695 878 3,422 4,378 16,914
    Female 824 3,172 1,348 5,123 1,749 6,711 986 3,849 4,907 18,885
MPN subtype, No.
    PV 1,249 1,410 1,206 901 4,766
    ET 155 773 1,237 460 2,625
    PMF 239 373 309 174 1,095
    MPN-U* 470 329 799

Abbreviations: ET, essential thrombocythemia; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasm; MPN-U, MPN unclassified; PMF, primary myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera.

*MPN-U was not included in the Swedish Cancer Register until 1993.

The cause-specific mortality rate was higher in patients with MPN than in matched controls (HRs > 1.0) for most causes of death and age groups (Table 2). The HRs for death from hematologic malignancies was 92.8 (95% CI, 70.0 to 123.1), and from infections, 2.7 (95% CI, 2.4 to 3.1), in the MPN cohort compared with controls. In patients with MPN aged 70 to 79 years at diagnosis, the HR for death from cardiovascular disease was 1.5 (95% CI, 1.4 to 1.7), from cerebrovascular disease 1.5 (1.3 to 1.8), from solid tumor 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.3), and from other disorders 2.4 (95% CI, 2.1 to 2.6) compared with corresponding controls. In the younger age groups, relative differences in the risk of dying from vascular diseases between patients with MPN and controls were greater. HRs for death from cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease in patients with MPN aged 50 to 59 years at diagnosis were 2.2 (95% CI, 1.6 to 3.1) and 5.1 (95% CI, 2.8 to 9.4), respectively, compared with matched controls (Table 2).

Table

Table 2. HRs and 95% CIs of Cause-Specific Deaths in Patients With MPNs Compared With Controls

Table 2. HRs and 95% CIs of Cause-Specific Deaths in Patients With MPNs Compared With Controls

Age or Cause Age of Patient at Diagnosis
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Age of patient with MPN at diagnosis, years 18 to 49 50 to 59 60 to 69 70 to 79 ≥ 80
Infection 2.7 2.4 to 3.1
Hematologic malignancy 92.8 70.0 to 123.1
Solid tumor 2.5 1.3 to 4.7 1.4 1.0 to 2.0 1.1 0.9 to 1.4 1.2 1.0 to 1.3 1.0 0.8 to 1.2
Cardiovascular disease 8.8 3.9 to 19.6 2.2 1.6 to 3.1 1.8 1.5 to 2.2 1.5 1.4 to 1.7 1.6 1.4 to 1.8
Cerebrovascular disease 8.7 0.8 to 96.3 5.1 2.8 to 9.4 2.8 2.1 to 3.7 1.5 1.3 to 1.8 1.4 1.2 to 1.7
Other disorders 5.1 3.1 to 8.6 4.2 3.2 to 5.6 3.8 3.2 to 4.4 2.4 2.1 to 2.6 1.8 1.6 to 2.0

NOTE. All HRs are adjusted for sex and calendar period of diagnosis. Because of interactions, HRs are shown separately for the different age groups except for infection and hematologic malignancy for which, as a result of a small number of controls dying as a result of these causes, HRs are shown for all ages.

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Results from the cumulative incidence functions, including competing risks, were illustrated by using the largest patient group, eg, male patients in whom MPN was diagnosed between the ages 70 and 79 years during 1993 to 2000. These patients had an overall 10-year probability of death of 75.0% compared with 49.0% in matched controls (Fig 1A). The 10-year probabilities of death were higher in patients with MPN versus matched controls for infections (4.6% v 2.3%), hematologic malignancies (13.6% v 0.2%), and other disorders (24.9% v 14.8%). However, no large difference was observed between patients and controls in the 10-year probabilities of dying from cardiovascular diseases (16.8% v 15.2%), cerebrovascular diseases (5.6% v 5.2%), or solid tumors (9.7% v 11.4%; Fig 1A). In female patients with MPN of the same age group and calendar period, the distribution of causes of death was similar, but the overall 10-year probability of death was lower, namely, 61.0% for patients with MPN and 36.3% for matched controls (Fig 1B). Overall, 7.2% of deaths in patients with MPN were caused by AML.

In the younger age groups, the 10-year probability of death from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease was higher in patients with MPN than in matched controls. For male patients with MPN aged 50 to 59 years at diagnosis from 1993 to 2000, 10-year mortality from cardiovascular disease was 4.2% versus 2.1% for controls and from cerebrovascular disease, 1.9% versus 0.4%, respectively. The 10-year probability of death for each of the six causes are presented for patients with MPN and controls for all age groups, sex, and calendar periods in Appendix Tables A1 and A2 (online only).

Regarding the MPN subtypes, again in male patients with MPN aged 70 to 79 years at diagnosis during 1993 to 2000, the 10-year probabilities of death was 70.7% in patients with PV, 67.2% in those with ET, and 89.7% in patients with PMF (Fig 2). The most common cause of death was cardiovascular disease in patients with PV (18.9%) and ET (16.3%), whereas patients with PMF had an increased probability of dying from hematologic malignancies (20.1%).

Ten-year mortality decreased for the recent cohorts, more so in patients with MPN than in matched controls primarily because of reduced probabilities of death from infections and hematologic malignancies. However, the observed decrease in mortality from hematologic malignancies was mainly explained by changes between the first (1973-1982) and second (1983-1999) calendar periods; thereafter, the decrease was less pronounced (Fig 3A). A similar pattern of decline in cardiovascular mortality occurred over time in male patients with MPN aged 70 to 79 and in matched controls (Fig 3A). In men age 50 to 59 at diagnosis, 10-year probabilities of death from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases decreased more in patients with MPN than in their matched controls (Fig 3B).

The most common causes of death among other disorders were congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, pulmonary diseases, and dementia. Venous thrombosis was a less frequent cause of death in this category.

In this population-based study of 9,285 patients with MPN and more than 35,000 matched controls, mortality rates from all six causes of death were higher in patients than in controls. The excess mortality in patients was mainly explained by death from hematologic malignancy, infections, and other disorders. The probability of dying from cardiovascular disease was elevated in younger patients with MPN, whereas no significant difference was observed in older patients with MPN compared with their corresponding controls when we accounted for competing risks. Ten-year survival improved in later cohorts of patients with MPN primarily because of reduced probabilities of dying from hematologic malignancy, infection, and, in younger patients, cardiovascular disease. Importantly, the probability of death resulting from hematologic malignancy decreased, but there is nonetheless a persisting need for better disease-specific treatment.

The excess mortality in patients with MPN was largely attributed to death from hematologic malignancies. During the study period, use of hydroxyurea increased whereas use of potentially leukemogenic treatments, such as alkylating agents and radioactive phosphorus, decreased. The less frequent use of leukemogenic treatments may partly explain the reduced probability of dying from hematologic malignancies between the first and second calendar periods.12,27 Except for the introduction of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for selected patients, strategies for cytoreductive treatment did not undergo any major changes during recent calendar periods.28,29 The modern specific treatments, including Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors, were not in use during the study period. Ruxolitinib, the first approved JAK2 inhibitor, was recently shown to improve survival in patients with PMF.30,31 The JAK2 inhibitors and other novel therapies now in clinical studies will, we hope, lead to further improvements in the quality of life and survival of patients with MPN.

Risk of death from infections was elevated in patients with MPNs. Most deaths in this category resulted from bacterial infections. Patients with MPNs may be more susceptible than others to infectious diseases either because of the disease itself or because of long-term therapy with cytoreductive agents. The risk of death from infections decreased over time, a finding which may reflect improved diagnostics and treatment of infectious complications. The role of infections in patients with MPN needs to be further elucidated as infections are becoming increasingly important in the era of novel immunomodulatory agents.

Patients with MPN had significantly higher mortality rates from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease than did those of matched controls when comparing cause-specific mortality rates (HRs). However, when we accounted for competing risks, increased 10-year mortality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease was observed in young patients, whereas no significant difference was observed between older patients with MPN and their corresponding controls. In the younger age groups, the decrease in 10-year mortality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease over time was larger in patients with MPN than in controls, whereas the pattern of decrease over time was similar in older patients with MPN and their corresponding controls. Advances in MPN treatment, such as prophylactic low-dose aspirin and more stringent criteria for phlebotomy,32,33 has most likely contributed to the improved survival in patients with MPN. In addition, general improvements—for example, reduced smoking rates, more optimal treatment of hyperlipidemia, and better acute management of vascular events—have contributed to decreased mortality from cardiovascular disease in both patients with MPN and in controls.34,35 The higher cardiovascular death rate in young patients with MPN compared with controls is an important finding that needs further assessment. Young patients with MPN are currently considered to have a low risk of thrombosis, and cytoreductive therapy is not generally recommended.29,3638 Our findings imply that further optimization of thromboprophylaxis in MPNs is of great importance, and that enhanced risk stratification measures to identify and treat high-risk patients younger than 60 years are needed.

Mortality rates from solid tumors tended to be higher in patients with MPN than in controls. An elevated risk of nonhematologic cancers and lymphoproliferative disorders in patients with MPN has previously been reported.3941 Treatment with potentially DNA-mutagenic cytoreductive agents as well as a possible inherited propensity to develop malignant diseases may be important, especially in patients with MPN aged 18 to 49 years in whom the mortality rate from solid tumors was significantly elevated.

In the subtype analysis, all subtypes including ET were associated with an elevated 10-year mortality in patients compared with controls. Patients with PV and ET had a high risk of death from cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease. In PV, these results are supported by results of previous studies.10,13,42,43 However, some investigators found transformation to AML to be the leading cause of death in PV.44,45 Although ET has been associated with a high risk of thrombosis,37,46,47 it is often considered a more benign disease, and the few studies on causes of death have shown varying results.4851 However, during the earlier calendar periods of this study, there may have been a certain selective reporting of only the patient with more severe ET to the cancer register. We cannot exclude some degree of misclassification of early PMF as ET, which may have led to an overestimation of deaths resulting from hematologic malignancy in the ET group. In addition, changes in classification systems have gradually led to a more pure ET population in recent years, a population that most likely will have a better prognosis.52 PMF was associated with a high probability of death resulting from hematologic malignancies, reflecting the inherent higher risk of disease progression and transformation to AML and myelodysplastic syndromes compared with PV and ET.12,52 In addition, patients with PMF have an elevated risk of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events, which contribute to the excess mortality.38,52,53 Despite possible uncertainties in subtype classification during the early calendar periods, MPNs are associated with disease progression and risk of thromboembolic events, which both need to be addressed to improve outcomes.

The strengths of this study are the population-based design on the basis of Swedish registries, which generally have a high level of coverage and accuracy,20,24 and the use of both relative risks and absolute probabilities in the presence of competing risks. Because of the competing causes of death, results from the two risk estimates differ slightly and need explanation. The cause-specific HRs of all of six causes of death were higher in patients with MPN than in the matched controls. However, in absolute terms, when we take into account that patients are at risk of dying from more than one cause, the proportion of deaths from each cause is not consistently higher in patients with MPN than in the controls. Also, by preventing patients from dying from certain causes, they will, over time, have a higher risk of dying from something else, hence the increase in deaths from other causes.

One of the limitations of this study is the quality of the Cause of Death Register, which is user dependent. In addition, the number of autopsies has decreased since the 1970s.20 We had no information about detailed clinical features or treatment, because this was not recorded in the Swedish Cancer Register at the time. Moreover, the observed excess mortality from other causes in patients with MPN may, to a certain degree, reflect various underlying medical illnesses that contributed to the medical work-up and that eventually led to the detection of the MPN. In addition, changes in classification systems, increased coverage of the cancer register, and earlier disease detection during recent calendar periods may influence the observed improvement in survival over time.3 All MPN subtype analyses were based on limited numbers of patients divided by age groups and calendar period of diagnosis and should, therefore, be interpreted with some caution.

In summary, the elevated 10-year mortality observed in patients with MPN compared with controls was explained by deaths from hematologic malignancies, infections, other disorders, and, in younger patients, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases as well. Ten-year mortality from cardiovascular disease decreased over time, and the largest decrease was observed in younger patients with MPN. Mortality from hematologic malignancies declined primarily between the first and second calendar periods but was prominent throughout the study period. Our results underline the demand for disease-modifying treatments as well as improved prevention of thromboembolic and infectious complications in patients with MPN, something that it is hoped can be achieved with the emerging tailored treatments.

© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Supported by grants from the regional agreement concerning medical education and research in health and medical care between the Stockholm County Council and the Karolinska Institutet, Adolf H. Lundin Charitable Foundation, Blodcancerfonden, the Swedish Cancer Society, and the Karolinska Institutet Foundations.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Disclosures provided by the authors are available with this article at www.jco.org.

Conception and design: Malin Hultcrantz, Sally R. Wilkes, Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson, Therese M.-L. Andersson, Paul W. Dickman, Paul C. Lambert, Magnus Björkholm

Administrative support: Malin Hultcrantz, Magnus Björkholm

Provision of study materials or patients: Malin Hultcrantz, Sally R. Wilkes, Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson, Åsa R. Derolf, Jan Samuelsson, Ola Landgren, Magnus Björkholm

Collection and assembly of data: Malin Hultcrantz, Sally R. Wilkes, Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson, Therese M.-L. Andersson, Åsa R. Derolf, Jan Samuelsson, Paul C. Lambert

Data analysis and interpretation: All authors

Manuscript writing: All authors

Final approval of manuscript: All authors

1. SH Swerdlow, ES Jaffe : WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues 2008 International Agency for Research on Cancer, et al Lyon, France International Agency for Research on Cancer Google Scholar
2. F Cervantes, F Passamonti, G Barosi : Life expectancy and prognostic factors in the classic BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative disorders Leukemia 22: 905914,2008 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
3. M Hultcrantz, SY Kristinsson, TM Andersson , etal: Patterns of survival among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms diagnosed in Sweden from 1973 to 2008: a population-based study J Clin Oncol 30: 29953001,2012 LinkGoogle Scholar
4. R Kralovics, F Passamonti, AS Buser , etal: A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders N Engl J Med 352: 17791790,2005 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
5. RL Levine, M Wadleigh, J Cools , etal: Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis Cancer Cell 7: 387397,2005 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
6. C James, V Ugo, JP Le Couedic , etal: A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera Nature 434: 11441148,2005 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
7. EJ Baxter, LM Scott, PJ Campbell , etal: Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders Lancet 365: 10541061,2005 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
8. LM Scott, W Tong, RL Levine , etal: JAK2 exon 12 mutations in polycythemia vera and idiopathic erythrocytosis N Engl J Med 356: 459468,2007 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
9. Y Pikman, BH Lee, T Mercher , etal: MPLW515L is a novel somatic activating mutation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia PLoS Med 3: e270,2006 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
10. G Finazzi : A prospective analysis of thrombotic events in the European collaboration study on low-dose aspirin in polycythemia (ECLAP) Pathol Biol (Paris) 52: 285288,2004 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
11. G Finazzi, V Caruso, R Marchioli , etal: Acute leukemia in polycythemia vera: An analysis of 1638 patients enrolled in a prospective observational study Blood 105: 26642670,2005 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
12. M Björkholm, AR Derolf, M Hultcrantz , etal: Treatment-related risk factors for transformation to acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes in myeloproliferative neoplasms J Clin Oncol 29: 24102415,2011 LinkGoogle Scholar
13. R Marchioli, G Finazzi, R Landolfi , etal: Vascular and neoplastic risk in a large cohort of patients with polycythemia vera J Clin Oncol 23: 22242232,2005 LinkGoogle Scholar
14. F Cervantes, B Dupriez, A Pereira , etal: New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment Blood 113: 28952901,2009 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
15. AP Polednak : Recent decline in the U.S. death rate from myeloproliferative neoplasms, 1999-2006 Cancer Epidemiol 36: 133136,2012 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
16. F Passamonti, E Rumi, E Pungolino , etal: Life expectancy and prognostic factors for survival in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia Am J Med 117: 755761,2004 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
17. F Palandri, L Catani, N Testoni , etal: Long-term follow-up of 386 consecutive patients with essential thrombocythemia: Safety of cytoreductive therapy Am J Hematol 84: 215220,2009 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
18. F Passamonti, E Rumi, L Arcaini , etal: Prognostic factors for thrombosis, myelofibrosis, and leukemia in essential thrombocythemia: A study of 605 patients Haematologica 93: 16451651,2008 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
19. Cancer incidence in Sweden 2011 (Cancerförekomst i Sverige 2011) 2012 Sverige Socialstyrelsen Stockholm, Sweden Socialstyrelsen Google Scholar
20. Dödsorsaksstatistik historik, produktionsmetoder och tillförlitlighet Sverige Socialstyrelsen http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2010/2010-4-33 Google Scholar
21. NI Berlin : Diagnosis and classification of the polycythemias Semin Hematol 12: 339351,1975 MedlineGoogle Scholar
22. S Murphy, P Peterson, H Iland , etal: Experience of the Polycythemia Vera Study Group with essential thrombocythemia: A final report on diagnostic criteria, survival, and leukemic transition by treatment Semin Hematol 34: 2939,1997 MedlineGoogle Scholar
23. ES HN Jaffe, H Stein, JW (eds) Vardiman : World Health Organization classification of tumours: Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues 2001 Google Scholar
24. I Turesson, MS Linet, M Björkholm , etal: Ascertainment and diagnostic accuracy for hematopoietic lymphoproliferative malignancies in Sweden 1964-2003 Int J Cancer 121: 22602266,2007 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
25. P Royston, MK Parmar : Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects Stat Med 21: 21752197,2002 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
26. SR Hinchliffe, PC Lambert : Flexible parametric modelling of cause-specific hazards to estimate cumulative incidence functions BMC Med Res Methodol 13: 13,2013 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
27. PD Berk, JD Goldberg, MN Silverstein , etal: Increased incidence of acute leukemia in polycythemia vera associated with chlorambucil therapy N Engl J Med 304: 441447,1981 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
28. G Birgegård, M Björkholm, J Kutti , etal: Polycytemia vera, essentiell trombocytemi och myelofibros: Diagnostik, behandling och Uppföljning—Rekommendationer från en nationell arbetsgrupp 1998 Stockholm, Sweden Swedish Orphan Google Scholar
29. T Barbui, G Barosi, G Birgegard , etal: Philadelphia-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: Critical concepts and management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet J Clin Oncol 29: 761770,2011 LinkGoogle Scholar
30. S Verstovsek, RA Mesa, J Gotlib , etal: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis N Engl J Med 366: 799807,2012 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
31. C Harrison, JJ Kiladjian, HK Al-Ali , etal: JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis N Engl J Med 366: 787798,2012 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
32. R Landolfi, R Marchioli, J Kutti , etal: Efficacy and safety of low-dose aspirin in polycythemia vera N Engl J Med 350: 114124,2004 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
33. R Marchioli, G Finazzi, G Specchia , etal: Cardiovascular events and intensity of treatment in polycythemia vera N Engl J Med 368: 2233,2013 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
34. Hjärtsjukvård: öppna jämförelser och utvärdering 2009 2009 Sverige Socialstyrelsen Stockholm, Sweden Socialstyrelsen Google Scholar
35. U Stenestrand, J Lindback, L Wallentin : Long-term outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs prehospital and in-hospital thrombolysis for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction JAMA 296: 17491756,2006 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
36. CL Andersen, B Andreasson, H Hasselbalch , etal: Nordic guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms 2013 for the Nordic MNP Study Group Copenhagen, Denmark Nordic MNP Study Group Google Scholar
37. T Barbui, G Finazzi, A Carobbio , etal: Development and validation of an International Prognostic Score of thrombosis in WHO-essential thrombocythemia (IPSET-thrombosis) Blood 120: 51285133,2012 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
38. T Barbui, A Carobbio, F Cervantes , etal: Thrombosis in primary myelofibrosis: Incidence and risk factors Blood 115: 778782,2010 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
39. E Rumi, F Passamonti, C Elena , etal: Increased risk of lymphoid neoplasm in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm: A study of 1,915 patients Haematologica 96: 454458,2011 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
40. AM Vannucchi, G Masala, E Antonioli , etal: Increased risk of lymphoid neoplasms in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18: 20682073,2009 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
41. H Frederiksen, DK Farkas, CF Christiansen , etal: Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms and subsequent cancer risk: A Danish population-based cohort study Blood 118: 65156520,2011 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
42. Polycythemia vera: The natural history of 1213 patients followed for 20 years Ann Intern Med 123: 656664,1995 Gruppo Italiano Studio Policitemia Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
43. J Bai, Y Xue, L Ye , etal: Risk factors of long-term incidences of thrombosis, myelofibrosis and evolution into malignance in polycythemia vera: A single center experience from China Int J Hematol 88: 530535,2008 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
44. A O'Donovan, G Rush, G Hoatam , etal: Suicidal ideation is associated with elevated inflammation in patients with major depressive disorder Depress Anxiety 30: 307314,2013 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
45. JJ Kiladjian, S Chevret, C Dosquet , etal: Treatment of polycythemia vera with hydroxyurea and pipobroman: Final results of a randomized trial initiated in 1980 J Clin Oncol 29: 39073013,2011 LinkGoogle Scholar
46. CN Harrison, PJ Campbell, G Buck , etal: Hydroxyurea compared with anagrelide in high-risk essential thrombocythemia N Engl J Med 353: 3345,2005 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
47. A Carobbio, J Thiele, F Passamonti , etal: Risk factors for arterial and venous thrombosis in WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia: An international study of 891 patients Blood 117: 58575859,2011 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
48. M Bazzan, G Tamponi, P Schinco , etal: Thrombosis-free survival and life expectancy in 187 consecutive patients with essential thrombocythemia Ann Hematol 78: 539543,1999 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
49. CS Chim, YL Kwong, AK Lie , etal: Long-term outcome of 231 patients with essential thrombocythemia: Prognostic factors for thrombosis, bleeding, myelofibrosis, and leukemia Arch Intern Med 165: 26512658,2005 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
50. P Fenaux, M Simon, MT Caulier , etal: Clinical course of essential thrombocythemia in 147 cases Cancer 66: 549556,1990 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
51. F Palandri, N Polverelli, L Catani , etal: Very elderly patients with essential thrombocythaemia: Are they a separate category? A monocentric study on 118 patients older than 75 years Br J Haematol 156: 676679,2012 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
52. T Barbui, J Thiele, F Passamonti , etal: Survival and disease progression in essential thrombocythemia are significantly influenced by accurate morphologic diagnosis: An international study J Clin Oncol 29: 31793184,2011 LinkGoogle Scholar
53. G Finazzi, A Carobbio, J Thiele , etal: Incidence and risk factors for bleeding in 1104 patients with essential thrombocythemia or prefibrotic myelofibrosis diagnosed according to the 2008 WHO criteria Leukemia 26: 716719,2012 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
Risk and Cause of Death in Patients Diagnosed With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Sweden Between 1973 and 2005: A Population-Based Study

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or jco.ascopubs.org/site/ifc.

Malin Hultcrantz

No relationship to disclose

Sally R. Wilkes

No relationship to disclose

Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson

No relationship to disclose

Therese M.-L. Andersson

No relationship to disclose

Åsa R. Derolf

No relationship to disclose

Sandra Eloranta

No relationship to disclose

Jan Samuelsson

Honoraria: Novartis, Shire

Ola Landgren

Consulting or Advisory Role: Onyx, Millennium

Paul W. Dickman

No relationship to disclose

Paul C. Lambert

No relationship to disclose

Magnus Björkholm

No relationship to disclose

Selection of Matched Population Controls

For each patient with MPN, four population controls were randomly selected from the Swedish Total Population Register, an electronic register of all Swedish residents (including noncitizens) maintained by the Swedish Tax Agency. The selection was performed by the government agency Statistics Sweden (Statistiska Centralbyrån) using stratified simple random sampling. In detail, for each patient with MPN, a sampling frame comprising all eligible controls was constructed from the total population register. That is, all individuals with the same values of the matching variables (sex, year of birth, and county of residency) at the time MPN was diagnosed in the patient were identified. To be eligible, controls had to be alive and free of any hematologic malignancy at the time of diagnosis of the corresponding patient with MPN. Patients with MPN were removed from the sampling frame and were not eligible as controls. For each patient with MPN, four controls were then randomly selected from the eligible controls, such that each of the eligible controls had the same probability of being selected. If fewer than four eligible matched controls were found, we chose to include fewer controls per patient rather than imperfectly matched controls.

Description of the Flexible Parametric Model

A flexible parametric survival model using restricted cubic splines was used to estimate the cause-specific mortality rates for each of the six different causes of death in patients with MPN compared with matched population controls during the first 10 years after diagnosis. The knot locations for the splines were selected separately for each of the six causes of death using the first and last death times along with the 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles of the death times to allow the underlying shape of the hazard function to vary between the different causes. The main analysis included all subtypes combined, and results are presented as all MPN subtypes together, if not specified otherwise. Age was categorized into the groups 18 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, 70 to 79, and 80 years and older. Calendar period of diagnosis was categorized as 1973 to 1982, 1983 to 1992, 1993 to 2000, and 2001 to 2005. All main effects (status of patient with MPN patient, age group, and calendar period) were included in the model. Two-way interactions were assessed by using likelihood ratio tests. The final model included the variables patient status (patient with MPN or matched control), age group, period of diagnosis, and sex. The 60-to-69 age group, the 1973-to-1982 calendar period of diagnosis, and males were chosen as the reference groups for age, period, and sex, respectively. Interaction terms between patient status (patient with MPN or control) and age group were also included in the final model for all causes except infection and hematologic malignancy. For sensitivity analysis, we fitted models with and without additional interactions to compare predictions of the cumulative incidence functions given different assumptions and observed no major differences in the predicted values. No time-dependent effects were found to be significant, and therefore, the proportional hazards assumption was assumed to be reasonable for all six causes of death.

Table

Table A1. Ten-Year Probabilities With 95% CIs of Dying As a Result of the Different Causes of Death in Male Patients With MPN and Matched Controls by Calendar Period and Age Group (years)

Table A1. Ten-Year Probabilities With 95% CIs of Dying As a Result of the Different Causes of Death in Male Patients With MPN and Matched Controls by Calendar Period and Age Group (years)

Group 18 to 49
50 to 59
60 to 69
70 to 79
≥ 80
1973-1982
Patient (n = 60) Control (n = 239) Patient (n = 126) Control (n = 498) Patient (n = 234) Control (n = 921) Patient (n = 305) Control (n = 1,176) Patient (n = 94) Control (n = 347)
Probability, % (95% CI)
    Infection 0.9 (0.4 to 1.4) 0.4 (0.1 to 0.6) 1.1 (0.6 to 1.7) 0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) 3.3 (2.6 to 4.1) 1.7 (1.3 to 2.1) 6.5 (5.4 to 7.6) 3.8 (3.2 to 4.3) 11.1 (9.1 to 13.1) 7.5 (6.3 to 8.7)
    Solid tumor 2.4 (1.2 to 3.6) 1.1 (0.7 to 1.5) 4.6 (3.1 to 6.0) 4.0 (3.3 to 4.7) 7.1 (5.7 to 8.5) 8.5 (7.6 to 9.5) 9.0 (7.7 to 10.3) 12.0 (10.9 to 13.1) 5.5 (4.3 to 6.7) 10.4 (9.2 to 11.6)
    Hematologic malignancy 8.6 (6.1 to 11.2) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.1) 12.7 (9.9 to 15.4) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2) 18.0 (15.2 to 20.8) 0.2 (0.2 to 0.3) 17.2 (14.7 to 19.7) 0.3 (0.2 to 0.3) 14.9 (12.2 to 17.7) 0.2 (0.2 to 0.3)
    Cardiovascular disease 4.5 (2.4 to 6.5) 0.6 (0.2 to 0.9) 8.3 (6.0 to 10.6) 4.6 (3.7 to 5.5) 16.2 (13.9 to 18.4) 12.3 (11.2 to 13.5) 27.0 (24.6 to 29.3) 27.7 (26.1 to 29.3) 32.4 (29.2 to 35.6) 37.0 (34.8 to 39.3)
    Cerebrovascular disease 0.4 (0.0 to 0.9) 0.0 (0.0 to 0.1) 3.0 (1.7 to 4.2) 0.7 (0.4 to 1.0) 5.2 (4.0 to 6.4) 2.6 (2.1 to 3.1) 7.0 (5.8 to 8.2) 7.5 (6.6 to 8.4) 8.4 (6.8 to 10.0) 11.1 (9.7 to 12.5)
    Other disorders 4.7 (3.1 to 6.3) 1.0 (0.6 to 1.4) 9.8 (7.8 to 11.9) 2.8 (2.3 to 3.4) 15.9 (14.0 to 17.8) 6.0 (5.3 to 6.6) 22.1 (20.1 to 24.1) 15.0 (13.9 to 16.1) 26.7 (24.0 to 29.3) 28.1 (26.2 to 30.1)
Group 1983-1992
Patient (n = 128) Control (n = 509) Patient (n = 175) Control (n = 693) Patient (n = 325) Control (n = 1,263) Patient (n = 414) Control (n = 1,548) Patient (n = 166) Control (n = 603)
Probability, % (95% CI)
    Infection 0.8 (0.3 to 1.2) 0.3 (0.1 to 0.5) 1.0 (0.5 to 1.5) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.6) 3.1 (2.4 to 3.7) 1.5 (1.2 to 1.8) 6.4 (5.4 to 7.4) 3.5 (3.0 to 4.0) 11.6 (9.7 to 13.4) 7.4 (6.4 to 8.5)
    Solid tumor 2.3 (1.1 to 3.4) 1.0 (0.6 to 1.4) 4.4 (3.0 to 5.8) 3.7 (3.1 to 4.4) 7.2 (5.9 to 8.6) 8.2 (7.3 to 9.0) 9.7 (8.4 to 11.0) 12.1 (11.1 to 13.1) 6.3 (5.0 to 7.7) 11.3 (10.1 to 12.5)
    Hematologic malignancy 6.4 (4.6 to 8.3) 0.1 (0.0 to 0.1) 9.6 (7.5 to 11.7) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2) 14.1 (12.0 to 16.3) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2) 14.1 (12.1 to 16.0) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3) 12.7 (10.5 to 14.9) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3)
    Cardiovascular disease 3.0 (1.6 to 4.4) 0.4 (0.1 to 0.6) 5.7 (4.1 to 7.4) 3.0 (2.4 to 3.6) 11.7 (10.0 to 13.4) 8.4 (7.6 to 9.2) 20.8 (18.9 to 22.7) 20.0 (18.8 to 21.2) 26.6 (23.9 to 29.2) 28.7 (26.8 to 30.5)
    Cerebrovascular disease 0.3 (0.0 to 0.7) 0.0 (0.0 to 0.1) 2.3 (1.3 to 3.3) 0.5 (0.3 to 0.8) 4.2 (3.2 to 5.2) 2.0 (1.6 to 2.4) 6.1 (5.1 to 7.2) 6.1 (5.4 to 6.8) 7.8 (6.4 to 9.3) 9.7 (8.6 to 10.9)
    Other disorders 4.8 (3.2 to 6.4) 1.0 (0.6 to 1.4) 10.3 (8.2 to 12.4) 2.8 (2.3 to 3.4) 17.5 (15.5 to 19.5) 6.1 (5.5 to 6.8) 26.0 (23.9 to 28.0) 16.4 (15.4 to 17.5) 33.3 (30.6 to 36.1) 33.2 (31.3 to 35.1)
Group 1993-2000
Patient (n = 204) Control (n = 814) Patient (n = 239) Control (n = 949) Patient (n = 349) Control (n = 1,376) Patient (n = 468) Control (n = 1,783) Patient (n = 213) Control (n = 773)
Probability, % (95% CI)
    Infection 0.5 (0.2 to 0.8) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3) 0.6 (0.3 to 0.9) 0.3 (0.1 to 0.4) 2.0 (1.6 to 2.5) 0.9 (0.7 to 1.1) 4.6 (3.8 to 5.3) 2.3 (2.0 to 2.7) 9.1 (7.6 to 10.6) 5.5 (4.7 to 6.3)
    Solid tumor 2.0 (1.0 to 3.1) 0.9 (0.5 to 1.2) 4.0 (2.7 to 5.3) 3.3 (2.7 to 3.9) 6.8 (5.5 to 8.0) 7.3 (6.6 to 8.1) 9.7 (8.4 to 11.0) 11.4 (10.5 to 12.4) 7.0 (5.6 to 8.4) 11.7 (10.5 to 12.9)
    Hematologic malignancy 5.7 (4.1 to 7.3) 0.1 (0.0 to 0.1) 8.6 (6.8 to 10.4) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.1) 13.0 (11.1 to 15.0) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2) 13.6 (11.8 to 15.5) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2) 13.1 (10.9 to 15.2) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3)
    Cardiovascular disease 2.1 (1.2 to 3.1) 0.3 (0.1 to 0.4) 4.2 (3.0 to 5.3) 2.1 (1.7 to 2.6) 8.8 (7.5 to 10.1) 6.0 (5.4 to 6.6) 16.8 (15.2 to 18.4) 15.2 (14.2 to 16.2) 23.7 (21.3 to 26.1) 24.0 (22.4 to 25.7)
    Cerebrovascular disease 0.2 (0.0 to 0.5) 0.0 (0.0 to 0.1) 1.9 (1.1 to 2.7) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.6) 3.6 (2.7 to 4.4) 1.6 (1.3 to 1.9) 5.6 (4.6 to 6.5) 5.2 (4.6 to 5.8) 7.9 (6.4 to 9.3) 9.2 (8.1 to 10.3)
    Other disorders 4.0 (2.7 to 5.4) 0.8 (0.5 to 1.2) 8.8 (7.0 to 10.6) 2.4 (1.9 to 2.8) 15.6 (13.8 to 17.4) 5.2 (4.6 to 5.8) 24.9 (23.0 to 26.8) 14.8 (13.8 to 15.7) 35.4 (32.7 to 38.2 33.1 (31.3 to 34.9)
Group 2001-2008
Patient (n = 104) Control (n = 415) Patient (n = 156) Control (n = 622) Patient (n = 209) Control (n = 829) Patient (n = 242) Control (n = 929) Patient (n = 167) Control (n = 627)
Probability, % (95% CI)
    Infection 0.4 (0.2 to 0.7) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3) 0.6 (0.3 to 0.8) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) 1.8 (1.3 to 2.4) 0.8 (0.6 to 1.1) 4.2 (3.1 to 5.2) 2.1 (1.6 to 2.6) 8.5 (6.6 to 10.5) 5.1 (4.0 to 6.3)
    Solid tumor 2.0 (1.0 to 3.0) 0.8 (0.5 to 1.2) 3.9 (2.6 to 5.2) 3.2 (2.5 to 3.9) 6.6 (5.2 to 8.0) 7.1 (6.1 to 8.2) 9.7 (8.0 to 11.3) 11.3 (9.9 to 12.7) 7.1 (5.5 to 8.7) 11.8 (10.2 to 13.4)
    Hematologic malignancy 5.7 (3.9 to 7.5) 0.1 (0 to 0.1) 8.7 (6.5 to 10.8) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.1) 13.2 (10.6 to 15.8) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2) 13.9 (11.3 to 16.5) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2) 13.6 (10.9 to 16.3) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3)
    Cardiovascular disease 1.7 (0.9 to 2.4) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3) 3.2 (2.3 to 4.2) 1.7 (1.3 to 2.0) 6.9 (5.7 to 8.1) 4.7 (4.1 to 5.4) 13.4 (11.6 to 15.1) 12.0 (10.7 to 13.4) 19.3 (16.7 to 21.9) 19.4 (17.4 to 21.5
    Cerebrovascular disease 0.2 (0.0 to 0.5) 0.0 (0.0 to 0.1) 1.8 (1.0 to 2.6) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.6) 3.5 (2.5 to 4.4) 1.5 (1.2 to 1.9) 5.5 (4.3 to 6.6) 5.1 (4.2 to 6.0) 8.0 (6.2 to 9.7) 9.2 (7.6 to 10.7)
    Other disorders 4.2 (2.7 to 5.7) 0.9 (0.5 to 1.2) 9.2 (7.2 to 11.1) 2.5 (1.9 to 3.0) 16.4 (14.3 to 18.6) 5.5 (4.8 to 6.2) 26.6 (24.0 to 29.2) 15.7 (14.3 to 17.1) 38.9 (35.5 to 42.3) 36.0 (33.3 to 38.6)

Abbreviations: MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Table

Table A2. Ten-Year Probabilities With 95% CIs of Dying As a Result of the Different Causes of Death in Female Patients With MPN and Matched Controls by Calendar Period and Age Group (years)

Table A2. Ten-Year Probabilities With 95% CIs of Dying As a Result of the Different Causes of Death in Female Patients With MPN and Matched Controls by Calendar Period and Age Group (years)

Group 18 to 49
50 to 59
60 to 69
70 to 79
≥ 80
1973-1982
Patient (n = 65) Control (n = 260) Patient (n = 112) Control (n = 444) Patient (n = 225) Control (n = 877) Patient (n = 281) Control (n = 1,073) Patient (n = 141) Control (n = 518)
Probability, % (95% CI)
    Infection 0.6 (0.2 to 0.9) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) 0.8 (0.4 to 1.1) 0.3 (0.2 to 0.5) 2.4 (1.9 to 3.0) 1.1 (0.9 to 1.4) 5.4 (4.4 to 6.3) 2.8 (2.3 to 3.2) 10.3 (8.4 to 12.1) 6.4 (5.4 to 7.4)
    Solid tumor 1.6 (0.8 to 2.3) 0.7 (0.4 to 0.9) 3.1 (2.1 to 4.0) 2.5 (2.0 to 3.0) 5.1 (4.1 to 6.1) 5.6 (4.9 to 6.3) 7.2 (6.2 to 8.3) 8.6 (7.8 to 9.5) 5.0 (3.9 to 6.1) 8.6 (7.6 to 9.6)
    Hematologic malignancy 5.9 (4.1 to 7.7) 0.1 (0.0 to 0.1) 8.9 (6.9 to 11.0) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.1) 13.4 (11.2 to 15.7) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2) 13.9 (11.7 to 16.0) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2) 13.0 (10.6 to 15.3) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3)
    Cardiovascular disease 2.8 (1.5 to 4.0) 0.3 (0.1 to 0.6) 5.4 (3.8 to 6.9) 2.8 (2.2 to 3.3) 11.3 (9.6 to 13.0) 7.8 (7.0 to 8.6) 21.1 (19.1 to 23.1) 19.3 (18.1 to 20.6) 28.7 (25.8 to 31.6) 29.8 (27.9 to 31.7)
    Cerebrovascular disease 0.3 (0.0 to 0.8) 0.0 (0.0 to 0.1) 2.7 (1.5 to 3.8) 0.6 (0.3 to 0.9) 5.1 (3.9 to 6.3) 2.3 (1.9 to 2.7) 7.8 (6.4 to 9.1) 7.3 (6.5 to 8.2) 10.6 (8.6 to 12.5) 12.6 (11.1 to 14.1)
    Other disorders 3.6 (2.3 to 4.8) 0.8 (0.5 to 1.0) 7.8 (6.2 to 9.4) 2.1 (1.7 to 2.5) 13.7 (12.0 to 15.4) 4.6 (4.1 to 5.2) 21.5 (19.6 to 23.4) 12.9 (11.9 to 13.9) 29.4 (26.7 to 32.1) 28.1 (26.2 to 30.0)
Group 1983-1992
Patient (n = 118) Control (n = 471) Patient (n = 124) Control (n = 491) Patient (n = 322) Control (n = 1,259) Patient (n = 542) Control (n = 2,034) Patient (n = 242) Control (n = 868)
Probability, % (95% CI)
    Infection 0.5 (0.2 to 0.8) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3) 0.7 (0.4 to 1.0) 0.3 (0.1 to 0.4) 2.2 (1.7 to 2.7) 1.0 (0.8 to 1.2) 5.1 (4.2 to 5.9) 2.5 (2.1 to 2.8) 10.4 (8.7 to 12.0) 6.1 (5.2 to 6.9)
    Solid tumor 1.5 (0.7 to 2.2) 0.6 (0.4 to 0.9) 2.9 (2.0 to 3.9) 2.4 (1.9 to 2.8) 5.1 (4.1 to 6.0) 5.3 (4.7 to 5.9) 7.5 (6.4 to 8.5) 8.4 (7.7 to 9.2) 5.6 (4.4 to 6.7) 9.0 (8.0 to 9.9)
    Hematologic malignancy 4.4 (3.1 to 5.7) 0.0 (0.0 to 0.1) 6.7 (5.2 to 8.2) 0.1 (0.0 to 0.1) 10.3 (8.6 to 12.0) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2) 11.0 (9.4 to 12.6) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2) 10.8 (8.9 to 12.6) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2)
    Cardiovascular disease 1.9 (1.0 to 2.7) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) 3.6 (2.6 to 4.7) 1.8 (1.5 to 2.2) 7.9 (6.7 to 9.1) 5.3 (4.7 to 5.8) 15.6 (14.1 to 17.1) 13.5 (12.6 to 14.4) 22.7 (20.4 to 25.1) 22.2 (20.7 to 23.6)
    Cerebrovascular disease 0.2 (0.0 to 0.6) 0.0 (0.0 to 0.1) 2.1 (1.2 to 2.9) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.6) 4.0 (3.1 to 5.0) 1.7 (1.4 to 2.1) 6.5 (5.4 to 7.6) 5.8 (5.1 to 6.4) 9.5 (7.8 to 11.2) 10.7 (9.5 to 11.8)
    Other disorders 3.6 (2.4 to 4.9) 0.8 (0.5 to 1.0) 8.0 (6.4 to 9.7) 2.1 (1.7 to 2.5) 14.6 (12.9 to 16.3) 4.7 (4.2 to 5.2) 24.1 (22.2 to 25.9) 13.7 (12.8 to 14.5) 35.5 (32.8 to 38.2) 31.8 (30.1 to 33.5)
Group 1993-2000
Patient (n = 237) Control (n = 947) Patient (n = 213) Control (n = 849) Patient (n = 348) Control (n = 1,373) Patient (n = 556) Control (n = 2,122) Patient (n = 395) Control (n = 1,420)
Probability, % (95% CI)
    Infection 0.3 (0.1 to 0.5) 0.1 (0.0 to 0.2) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.6) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2) 1.4 (1.1 to 1.7) 0.6 (0.5 to 0.7) 3.5 (2.9 to 4.0) 1.6 (1.3 to 1.9) 7.8 (6.6 to 9.1) 4.3 (3.7 to 4.9)
    Solid tumor 1.3 (0.6 to 1.9) 0.5 (0.3 to 0.8) 2.6 (1.8 to 3.4) 2.1 (1.7 to 2.5) 4.6 (3.7 to 5.5) 4.7 (4.2 to 5.2) 7.2 (6.2 to 8.2) 7.8 (7.1 to 8.4) 5.9 (4.7 to 7.1) 8.9 (8.0 to 9.8)
    Hematologic malignancy 3.8 (2.7 to 5.0) 0.0 (0.0 to 0.1) 5.9 (4.6 to 7.2) 0.1 (0.0 to 0.1) 9.3 (7.9 to 10.8) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.1) 10.4 (8.9 to 11.8) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2) 10.8 (9.1 to 12.6) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2)
    Cardiovascular disease 1.3 (0.7 to 1.9) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3) 2.6 (1.9 to 3.4) 1.3 (1.0 to 1.6) 5.8 (5.0 to 6.7) 3.7 (3.4 to 4.1) 12.1 (10.9 to 13.3) 10.0 (9.3 to 10.7) 19.5 (17.5 to 21.5) 17.8 (16.6 to 19.0)
    Cerebrovascular disease 0.2 (0.0 to 0.5) 0.0 (0.0 to 0.1) 1.6 (0.9 to 2.3) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.5) 3.3 (2.5 to 4.1) 1.4 (1.1 to 1.6) 5.6 (4.7 to 6.6) 4.8 (4.2 to 5.3) 9.2 (7.6 to 10.8) 9.6 (8.6 to 10.6)
    Other disorders 3.0 (2.0 to 4.1) 0.6 (0.4 to 0.9) 6.8 (5.4 to 8.2) 1.8 (1.4 to 2.1) 12.7 (11.2 to 14.2) 4.0 (3.5 to 4.4) 22.1 (20.4 to 23.8) 11.9 (11.2 to 12.7) 36.2 (33.6 to 38.8) 30.2 (28.7 to 31.8)
Group 2001-2008
Patient (n = 106) Control (n = 424) Patient (n = 153) Control (n = 609) Patient (n = 192) Control (n = 768) Patient (n = 279) Control (n = 1,100) Patient (n = 256) Control (n = 948)
Probability, % 95% CI
    Infection 0.3 (0.1 to 0.4) 0.1 (0.0 to 0.2) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.6) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2) 1.3 (0.9 to 1.6) 0.5 (0.4 to 0.7) 3.1 (2.3 to 3.9) 1.4 (1.1 to 1.8) 7.3 (5.6 to 8.9) 3.9 (3.0 to 4.8)
    Solid tumor 1.2 (0.6 to 1.9) 0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) 2.5 (1.7 to 3.4) 2.0 (1.6 to 2.4) 4.5 (3.5 to 5.5) 4.6 (3.9 to 5.3) 7.1 (5.9 to 8.3) 7.6 (6.6 to 8.6) 5.9 (4.6 to 7.3) 8.8 (7.6 to 10.0)
    Hematologic malignancy 3.8 (2.6 to 5.1) 0.0 (0.0 to 0.1) 5.9 (4.4 to 7.5) 0.1 (0.0 to 0.1) 9.4 (7.4 to 11.4) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2) 10.5 (8.5 to 12.6) 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2) 11.1 (8.9 to 13.3) 0.2 (0.1 to 0.2)
    Cardiovascular disease 1.0 (0.5 to 1.5) 0.1 (0.0 to 0.2) 2.0 (1.4 to 2.6) 1.0 (0.8 to 1.2) 4.6 (3.7 to 5.4) 2.9 (2.5 to 3.3) 9.5 (8.2 to 10.8) 7.8 (6.9 to 8.8) 15.6 (13.5 to 17.8) 14.1 (12.6 to 15.7)
    Cerebrovascular disease 0.2 (0.0 to 0.4) 0.0 (0.0 to 0.1) 1.6 (0.9 to 2.3) 0.3 (0.2 to 0.5) 3.2 (2.3 to 4.1) 1.3 (1.0 to 1.6) 5.5 (4.3 to 6.7) 4.6 (3.8 to 5.4) 9.1 (7.2 to 11.1) 9.4 (7.9 to 11.0)
    Other disorders 3.1 (2.0 to 4.2) 0.6 (0.4 to 0.9) 7.1 (5.5 to 8.6) 1.8 (1.4 to 2.2) 13.3 (11.5 to 15.1) 4.1 (3.6 to 4.7) 23.4 (21.1 to 25.7) 12.6 (11.4 to 13.8) 39.1 (35.8 to 42.5) 32.3 (29.9 to 34.8)

Abbreviations: MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasm.

COMPANION ARTICLES

No companion articles

ARTICLE CITATION

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.6652 Journal of Clinical Oncology 33, no. 20 (July 10, 2015) 2288-2295.

Published online June 01, 2015.

PMID: 26033810

ASCO Career Center