Article Tools
Article Tools
OPTIONS & TOOLS
COMPANION ARTICLES
ARTICLE CITATION
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.6.1189 Journal of Clinical Oncology - published online before print September 21, 2016
PMID: 8501505
Adherence to oral tamoxifen: a comparison of patient self-report, pill counts, and microelectronic monitoring.
Abstract
Recent innovations allow the integration of microelectronics into drug packaging, providing a continuous record of the interactions of the patient with the drug package. We hypothesized that adherence to oral tamoxifen, as measured by a pressure-activated microelectronic monitoring device, would be significantly discrepant from traditional measures of patient adherence, ie, patient self-report (SR) and pill counts (PCs).
Twenty-six patients receiving oral tamoxifen therapy were assessed by patient SR, PCs, and Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS; Aprex Corp, Fremont, CA) microelectronic monitoring. A microprocessor in the MEMS cap recorded each opening as a presumptive dose, listing the date, time, and duration of opening for later retrieval on a microcomputer. Patients were not informed that their adherence was to be monitored electronically or that PCs would be performed.
A total of 2,102 days (70.1 months) of tamoxifen therapy were monitored; patients were monitored for a mean of 2.92 months of tamoxifen therapy. SR adherence to oral tamoxifen was significantly higher than that suggested by either PCs (SR missed doses only v PC, P = .008) or MEMS adherence monitoring (SR missed doses only v MEMS missed doses only, P = .005; SR dosing-interval errors only v MEMS dosing-interval errors only, P < .0001; SR all dosing errors v MEMS all dosing errors, P < .0005). PC data also suggested significantly higher adherence rates than MEMS monitoring.
